MIA supporter says Woottens’ work under ‘diabolical attack’ 8

Aaron and Hur with Moses

At least one backer of the Messianic Israel Alliance feels its founders, Batya and Angus Wootten, are under “diabolical attack.” In the meantime, that backer is lobbing out accusations against unnamed parties of “‘murderous’ assaults.” He urges supporters of the Woottens “to hold up their arms as did Aaron and Hur with Moses in the time of battle.”

An email newsletter sent out April 11 by Natan Lawrence to the Hoshana Rabbah list, titled “An important announcement to the General Body of Redeemed Israelites everywhere,” asks for daily prayer for the Woottens. He calls them “the instruments (God) has raised up in this generation to bring forth the message of the restoration and reunification of the two houses of Israel.”

But they’re not being treated properly, he says.

Sadly, the most recent attacks are not the first attack against them, but the last in a long series of “murderous” assaults going back for many years.  It has been our hope that the perpetrators of these most recent attacks would, if not repent (our sincere hope!), at least back off. Instead, they have intensified their attacks, and hence the reason for this prayer request letter.

Then he prays that those prayers will “go forth like a lethal arrow shot into the heart of the enemies of Yeshua!”

Mr. Lawrence  also claims the offenders are “doing Satan’s bidding by touching the spiritual parents of this movement.” He says that “Satan doesn’t want the message of the restoration of the two houses of Israel to go forth.”

Activists in the Two-House/Messianic Israel movement sometimes express the feeling they’re under attack within the messianic movement as a whole and are treated unfairly, even with “lies and hatred.” But it’s not the usual MIA critics Lawrence has a problem with. It’s people within the Two-House/Messianic Israel movement that he’s indicting in the newsletter dated April 11. They are, he says, “backing off” the message that God is uniting the houses of Judah and Ephraim through the Messianic Israel movement.

To wit, there are many spiritual leaders and teachers in the Messianic Israel/Hebrew Roots camp that are now backing off from this message because they, in their words, claim that “it’s too divisive.” Some major Messianic leaders/teachers have even removed from their ministry websites all references to EphraimEzekiel 37the two-stick messagethe two houses and other such words and phrases. They now instead speak generically about “the Jews and the non-Jews coming together to become the one new man.” … Many are now backing away from the message of the two houses of Israel being reunited in Yeshua because for reasons of political correctness, political expediency and downright lust for money and power and, let me be perfectly blunt, the spirit of ecumenism! You see, if you don’t tell people the whole truth, but rather refrain from that which is not politically correct, you might get a larger monetary offering at the end of the day and sell a few more DVDs (the love of money is the root of all evil, as the Word of Elohim declares). …
Let me say that I shake and I tremble over the righteous judgments of Elohim that are about to befall those who in their superciliousness and puerile insolence are acting more like bratty, rebellious and thin-skinned, easily offended teenagers than mature, born again and Spirit filled and led adults. Whether they know it or not, they are now doing Satan’s bidding by touching the spiritual parents of this movement—those Elohim has anointed (i.e., Angus and Batya) to bring to this generation the message of the reuniting of the two houses of Israel. Even David, who YHVH anointed to be king of Israel, was smitten with guilt when he cut off the fringes of the garment of Saul—his murderous father-in-law. When he had the opportunity, David refused to touch “YHVH’s anointed”—one who was seeking to murder him. Yet, this end time generation of hypocritical religionists have no problem treating in an evil manner in complete disregard to the basic tenets of the Torah those YHVH has raised up to do his work. Paul describes these individuals well in 2 Timothy 3:1–9 when he speaks of perilous men and of the perilous times of the last days—these are men who are in love with themselves and money, who are narcissistic boasters, disobedient to parents (including the spiritual parents who raised them up and placed them on a ministry platform backed with resources and followers to boot!), they’re unthankful, unholy, unloving, unforgiving, brutal, lacking in self control, and traitors (!).

Mr. Lawrence is making an interesting accusation: By “backing off” certain aspects of the Messianic Israel Alliance message, he says, some messianics are “doing Satan’s bidding by touching the spiritual parents of this movement” and being disobedient to their “spiritual parents who raised them up and placed them on a ministry platform.” In other words, by expressing their opinions in good conscience, perhaps in ways they feel backed by Scripture, and which may not even have any connection to the Woottens, these unnamed people are “doing Satan’s bidding”—simply because they aren’t toeing the MIA line or doing things the way Lawrence thinks they should be done or saying things the way he thinks they should be said.

Who are the guilty parties? He doesn’t want to say. In his response to an email I sent to him asking him to clarify matters, he wrote

As far as the letter that I sent out to which you obliquely make reference, as I recently told one of your cohorts, what I have written, I have written by the Spirit of the Living YHVH Elohim. It was confirmed before and after by his prophets, apostles, and elders in redeemed Israel. Beyond that, it was simply a prayer request on behalf of my friends, and so that people could pray on target, spiritual issues were delineated. None of the names of the antagonists were mentioned, so anyone’s assumptions regarding to whom I was making reference is pure conjecture on their part.

If you have any further questions, I suggest you take them to your Father in heaven and let his Spirit answer them for you. Until YHVH puts additional words in my mouth, I will have nothing further to say on this subject.

I also asked the Woottens several questions in an email about Lawrence’s message, but they declined to answer them, calling them “leading questions” and asking me to “please cease and desist in your unfair pursuit of us.” They also said that I had previously put up an “untrue” post about Mrs. Wootten, which must have been where I disagreed with her approach to dealing with other Christians over Easter.

Actually, I was just trying to give them the opportunity to clarify things and give their side.

About the only things apparent from all of this are:

  • The MIA and its leadership have been stung by something or some things and are reeling a bit.
  • At least one of their vocal backers is pretty angry about it and says God is angry about it, too.
  • A lot of accusations are flying around in all directions with God’s name attached to them.
  • The Messianic Israel movement, at least as far as the MIA and their supporters are concerned, is in a somewhat confused state. For instance, Lawrence chastised various sites for removing references to “two-house” teachings, but the Woottens only days later released this newsletter in which they say the MIA is not a “two-house” organization.
email
  • http://dailyminyan.com Gene Shlomovich

    I think we are witnessing the disintegration of the Two-House and their foundation built on sand. It’s encouraging to see that many are moving away from them. Also, Mr. Lawrence has not done TH or its “spiritual parents” any favors by his rant.

    Great report, Mike.

  • Peter

    I for one don’t see them as the “spiritual parents” of Two House. I didn’t know anything about them, nor do I affiliate with the MIA, whatever that is. I still don’t know anything about Mrs. Wooten and haven’t read any of her writings. The only thing I know about her is that the UMJC dislikes her.

    I do know that Ezekiel 37 says that there will be a reunification of the Two Houses once the Messiah as the Davidic King takes the throne in the eschaton. I haven’t heard anyone refute that this is what Ezekiel 37 says. I also haven’t ever heard a refutation to the plain fact that the apostles cited Hosea’s prophecy regarding the promised restoration of the House of Israel and applied it to the gentiles. This is something I said in a comment today on Gene’s blog:

    Peter and Paul refer to the Hosea prophecy regarding the promised restoration of the House of Israel:
    1 Peter 2:9-10
    9 But you are a chosen people, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, God’s special possession, that you may declare the praises of him who called you out of darkness into his wonderful light. 10 Once you were not a people, but now you are the people of God; once you had not received mercy, but now you have received mercy.
    Romans 9:23-26
    24 even us, whom he also called, not only from the Jews but also from the Gentiles? 25 As he says in Hosea:“I will call them ‘my people’ who are not my people;and I will call her ‘my loved one’ who is not my loved one,”26 and,“In the very place where it was said to them, ‘You are not my people,’ there they will be called ‘children of the living God.’”
    Hosea 1:10-11
    “10 “Yet the Israelites will be like the sand on the seashore, which cannot be measured or counted. In the place where it was said to them, ‘You are not my people,’ they will be called ‘children of the living God.’ 11 The people of Judah and the people of Israel will come together; they will appoint one leader and will come up out of the land, for great will be the day of Jezreel.”
    Then you have James in Acts 15 taking a passage from Amos regarding the restoration of the House of Israel and applying it to the gentiles.
    In conclusion, that’s the way the Apostles would’ve answered your question. They saw the inclusion of the gentiles to be the restoration of the House of Israel (Eze 37).

  • http://dailyminyan.com Gene Shlomovich

    “I still don’t know anything about Mrs. Wooten and haven’t read any of her writings.”

    Peter, you may not have personally read any of Mrs. Wooten’s materials, but it’s very likely that whoever first exposed you to TH in the first place most certain has. That, or that person may have been among or was influenced by members of Herbert W. Armstrong ‘s Worldwide Church of God (the source of many messianics) or indulged in the Two-Houses’ direct linear ancestor, the British Israelism. One this is for sure, however – this stuff didn’t come into your head from thin air or from simply reading your Bible. It already has had quite a colorful history in Britain starting in 1800′s .

  • Barry Miller

    Gene,
    That an idea was misused by evil men does not make the idea evil or wrong.
    To advise someone to give up their birthright is to ask them to play the part of Esau, whom the Hebrew writer tells us became godless and immoral by selling so cheaply. From reading Peter’s words I doubt his birthright is for sale at any price.
    And how he found this prize of great value is of no consequence. What he does with it is his greatest challenge!
    Shalom, Barry

  • http://dailyminyan.com Gene Shlomovich

    “To advise someone to give up their birthright is to ask them to play the part of Esau, whom the Hebrew writer tells us became godless and immoral by selling so cheaply. ”

    Barry, to assume someone else’ birthright is thievery and to assume someone identity based on some make-belief ear-tickling fantazies is identity-theft. To repent from doing so is the right and moral thing to do.

    • Barry Miller

      Gene,
      Thanks for responding. I would very much like to sort this out as I have pondered it for many years.First let me say that my greatest dream, my biggest hope is to see Jewish Believers leading the “Household of Faith” (all of it ). Not only that, but I am sure it will happen and I am committed to working toward that end. Therefore rest assured that at least in my case I have no interest in stealing or denying anyone their birthright. That said please consider Jacob and Esau, while in our eyes, Jacob certainly appears to be less than honorable in his transactions, yet it is he who we hold with esteem and who received the name Israel. On the other side Esau, the party whom, to our natural eyes, appears to have been wronged, he is considered an example of what not to do, at all cost.

      Hebrews 12:14 Pursue peace with all men, and the sanctification without which no one will see the Lord. 15 See to it that no one comes short of the grace of God; that no root of bitterness springing up causes trouble, and by it many be defiled; 16 that there be no immoral or godless person like Esau, who sold his own birthright for a singlemeal. 17 For you know that even afterwards, when he desired to inherit the blessing, he was rejected, for he found no place for repentance, though he sought for it with tears.

      Therefore Gene it is not that I am reaching for something to which I am not entitled; rather it is that I am very fearful of denying that which I am. For if I deny or hold of little value a birthright, I am entitled to there seems to be a finality that offers no way back. If I must chose between being a thief or a denier, I will chose thief, and beg for a pardon like the one crucified next to Yeshua.
      Just one more thought; Jacob went through a lot of pain before he understood that each of his sons was of value and worthy of being blessed in their individual gifts. Jacob found a way to include all his sons in the future of the clan, David likewise found a way to include all twelve tribes and it’s David’s tabernacle I dream of having a hand in rebuilding.
      To the exclusion of none,
      I would love your thoughts.
      Shalom, Barry

  • http://dailyminyan.com Gene Shlomovich

    “If I must chose between being a thief or a denier, I will chose thief, and beg for a pardon like the one crucified next to Yeshua.”

    Barry, but if you base your understanding of “birthright” on a false and fanciful idea of “Two-House”/British Israelism, what good is that birthright then? If something is based on sand, it will be blown away by the winds of truth in short while.

    About Esau and Jacob. The way you put things about stealing birthright from Jews, you make Jacob (Jews) into Esau and fashion yourself into Jacob (Jews). Now, does this seem right to you? How is this not the classic Replacement Theology, just a bit differently formulated? It is.

    Make no mistake – Gentiles indeed share in Israel’s spiritual blessings, but not through their own supposed birthright and especially not by stealing one from Israel. They don’t share in Israel’s blessings by taking on the identity of Israel. Instead, they get them by the grace of G-d through His Son, the King of the Jews, Yeshua the Messiah when they are adopted as G-d’s sons and daughters.

    • Barry Miller

      Gene,
      Thanks again for your response and your tone.
      In my view to steal something is to take it away from someone else, I have no interest in that and therefore do not believe I am stealing but would rather steal than think lightly of a God given birthright, if I have one. Which you seem to doubt.
      First we agree on British Israelism, in my view the curses of Deuteronomy 28 make it clear that Israel will be scattered in to every nation PERIOD. So I consider British Israelism evil and racist. I worry about anyone who says they are here or they are there. Two House is a little more difficult for me it depends what you mean by Two House. Let’s stick with Bible and agreed upon history. The two kingdoms had different paths from Rehoboam’s time on.
      My final thought for this round is a response to this comment
      “Make no mistake – Gentiles indeed share in Israel’s spiritual blessings”
      I cannot find Gentiles in the New Covenant unless they are from the shattered nation of which Isaiah wrote.
      “For the head of Aram is Damascus and the head of Damascus is Rezin (now within another 65 years Ephraim will be shattered, so that it is no longer a people), Isaiah 7:8
      The New Covenant is exclusive to the house of Israel and the house of Judah.
      You know all these arguments. You know that together we are strong, divided we are weak. I don’t want your leadership role. I don’t want to replace you; I want to bring my gifts to the rebuilding of the ancient kingdom both spiritual and physical.
      Don’t be afraid, really we can do this…I believe in you, I believe in your leadership gifting.
      Please stand up and graciously lead instead of pushing brothers away, be a gatherer.
      Peace,
      Barry